A million-dollar IRA now forces a $37,736 withdrawal at 73 — but the retirees who plan ahead are turning a mandatory tax event into a manageable one.
Turn 73 with a seven-figure IRA, and the IRS stops asking. Required minimum distributions are not a suggestion — they are calculated, mandatory, and taxed as ordinary income whether you need the cash or not. But among the retirees and pre-retirees we work with, a clear pattern has emerged: the ones who start planning five to ten years before their first RMD keep meaningfully more of what they've built. Here is what that planning actually looks like in 2026.
RMDs begin at age 73 for anyone born 1951–1959, and age 75 for anyone born 1960 or later, under the SECURE 2.0 Act. The amount is your prior year-end account balance divided by an IRS life-expectancy factor — so a $1,000,000 traditional IRA at age 73 forces a withdrawal of roughly $37,736, taxed entirely as ordinary income. Miss it, and the penalty is a steep 25% of the shortfall (10% if corrected within two years).
The real damage is rarely the withdrawal itself — it's what the withdrawal drags with it: a higher marginal bracket, more of your Social Security becoming taxable, and in many cases, a Medicare surcharge that shows up two years later without warning.
Four tools do most of the work for retirees actively managing this exposure:
Medicare's Income-Related Monthly Adjustment Amount (IRMAA) uses a two-year income lookback — your 2026 premiums are set by your 2024 tax return. For 2026, the surcharge tiers begin at $109,000 MAGI for single filers and $218,000 for joint filers, and each tier is a hard cliff: cross it by a single dollar and you pay the full surcharge for the entire year, not a phased-in amount. A retiree who does a large Roth conversion or takes an outsized RMD today may not feel the consequence until a Medicare bill arrives two years later. This is the single most common surprise we see, and it's entirely avoidable with basis-point-level bracket planning done in advance.
RMD income is ordinary income — and ordinary income can be offset by ordinary losses, not just deferred or excluded. For retirees who materially participate in an active trade or business — a short-term rental they genuinely run, farmland they actively work — real depreciation and operating losses can offset that same ordinary RMD income, not just passive gains. We've written before about how a properly structured short-term rental functions as a tax engine in its own right; the same mechanism that shelters W-2 income during working years can be pointed at RMD income in retirement, provided the material-participation and profit-motive rules are genuinely met, not just assumed.
This isn't a strategy for everyone — it requires real operational involvement, documentation, and a legitimate profit motive, not a paper exercise built solely to offset a tax bill. But for retirees who already hold or are building an active real estate footprint, it's an underused bridge between two parts of the tax code that most advisors treat as unrelated.
None of these levers eliminate the RMD itself — it's mandatory by design. But the difference between a retiree who plans five years out and one who doesn't is often the difference between a $2,000 tax bill and a $9,000 one on the exact same withdrawal. The tools exist. The work is starting early enough to use them.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment, legal, or tax advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. All investments involve risk, including possible loss of principal.
Discover where your business or personal finances may have untapped opportunities.
Your numbers. Your strategy. Your next move.
© 2026 Copyright with Kubera Advisory Group
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Key Disclosures